|
Home | Books | Alternate History | Science Fiction Adventure | Writing | About | Contact Me |
Excerpt: All Timelines Lead To Rome An excerpt from the very rough first draft of my NanoWriMo (write a novel in a month challenge) novel No Italian Invasion of GreeceFrom my June 2009 Alternate History Newsletter The Italian invasion of Greece was typical Mussolini. It showed off the fascist dictator’s ignorance of logistics AH Challenge: Stopping the Genocides From the June 2009 issue of my alternate history newsletter. The twentieth century was the century of genocides. Could they have been stopped? Alternate History
mini-scenarios based on a common idea: What
if the World War II Great Powers understood some or all
of the things we currently do about climate and acted on them. PRESIDENT WILLIE P. MANGUM (1844-1845) From the January 2009 issue of my alternate history newsletter. Historically, Willie P. Mangum was President Pro Tem of the Senate between 1841 and 1845. He could have been president. Moving the Oil Discoveries AroundA series of what-ifs about the timing of the oil discoveries. Originally written for my January 2009 AH newsletter.
POD is an amateur press magazine and also a forum for discussing AH and AH-related ideas. A lot of the comments don't make sense unless you've following the dialogue. Here are some of my general-interest ones. |
This
is an alternate
history essay I wrote for the January 2009 issue of my alternate
history newsletter. Historically,
Willie P. Mangum was President Pro Tem of the Senate between 1841 and
1845. The president of the time, John Tyler, had been vice president
until the death of President Harrison. At that time there was no
provision for a new vice president to be appointed if a president or
vice president died. Until the succession laws were revised in 1886,
the president pro tem of the senate was next in line. In 1844, Willie
Mangum was one heartbeat away from the presidency. So
what? Well, I
think we can come up with some interesting consequences without
straining credibility too much. How about no US annexation of Texas?
An earlier US civil war? Maybe an independent California? Maybe even
other political entities like a Mormon Utah or an independent
Hispanic New Mexico? So
how do we end up
with President Mangum? Maybe slightly altering this incident would do
the trick: “The
last year
of Tyler's presidency was marred by a freak accident that killed two
of his Cabinet members. During a ceremonial cruise down the Potomac
River on February 28, 1844, the main gun of the USS Princeton
blew up during a demonstration firing. Tyler was unhurt, but Thomas
Gilmer, the Secretary of the Navy, and Abel P. Upshur, who had
succeeded Daniel Webster at the State Department nine months earlier,
were instantly killed.” (Wikipedia) So
the freak accident
kills Tyler as well as his cabinet members. What does that do? No US
Annexation of Texas?
Texas had been an independent republic for nearly a decade by 1844.
Texans wanted to join the US. Southern slave owners wanted Texas to
join the union to enhance southern power compared to the northern
free states. Northern states opposed annexation because they were
afraid of that result, and also because they knew that annexing Texas
meant war with Mexico. President
Tyler made
annexing Texas his top priority and the centerpiece of his failed
campaign to gain reelection. He was the first vice president to gain
the presidency due to the death of his president, and there was
enough ambiguity in the succession laws that many in the Senate and
Congress felt that he shouldn’t really be president so much as
a kind of caretaker until a new president was elected. Tyler moved
aggressively to gain the powers of an elected president, but was
still regarded by many as “Your Accidency”. Tyler took a
festering situation in the Texas annexation issue and inflamed it,
finally pushing through an annexation resolution just before he left
office, and setting in motion the chain of events that lead to the
Mexican-American war. Would
Mangum have
pursued that same policy? Probably not. He was a Whig from North
Carolina, in a Whig party that was very vulnerable to the sectional
resentments that Texas annexation would make worse. Even if he did
pursue annexation he wouldn’t have time to develop the kind of
power that Tyler had. Let’s
say that
Texas annexation is postponed. That doesn’t stop the wave of US
settlers pouring into Texas and into the officially Mexican
territories that historically became part of the United States after
the Mexican-American war. There were already over a thousand
non-Hispanic settlers in northern California by 1846, most of them
Americans. The Mormon migration to Utah started in 1847, before the
War with Mexico ended. It would have probably gone forward even
without the war. The Mexican government had little power in the area,
much of which was still ruled by Indians. Tribes like the Apaches and
Comanchees would have indignantly denied that they were part of
Mexico or that Mexico had any control over them. If
the Gold Rush
happened roughly on schedule with California still officially
controlled by Mexico and the northern part of it a power vacuum,
things could get ugly in a hurry. Gold rush towns were pretty lawless
anyway. Gold rush towns in an area with no significant legal
authority anywhere near them could be even more interesting. Let’s
see. We
have a Gold Rush and an immigration of up to 70,000 Mormons looking
for a promised land. We have a power vacuum over a quarter of a
continent. We have hoards of gold. We have intrigues between Mexican,
American, British, and maybe even French and Russian nationals, some
working for their governments, some looking to exploit the power
vacuum for their own financial or power ends. Sounds like a great
place to put a story and a truly awful place to raise a family. Wouldn’t
the US
just move into the vacuum eventually? Probably, but having that
happen too soon wouldn’t be anywhere near as much fun as I
think we can have with this one. The big issue would be that the
north was in line to gain a number of new states in the next several
years, while the slave states had no room to expand without annexing
Texas. An unlikely but fun possibility: the south decides that it
will eventually lose parity in the Senate and attempts to secede in
1850 instead of a decade later. Of course getting to the point of a
civil war would require an indecisive president like Buchanan. A more
decisive president would have probably fought back before losing
control of so much US territory. (Hopefully more later, but no
guarantees) Note: About
six months after I wrote this I saw an excellent set of alternate
history essays online, one of which paralleled this one in many ways,
though the author went a different way with the idea. I
misplaced the web address, but if you would like a different take on
this idea there is one out there. What you see here is a truncated on-line version of a larger zine that I contribute to POD, the alternate history APA. POD members get to look forward to more fun stuff. |