What if
France Had
Fought On From North Africa? Part V
Scenario Seeds
The Brazilian Gold Rush of
1930
The Siberian Connection
Best of the Comment Section
Return To Table of Contents
|
Sorry. I
seem to have bogged down on this one. I’m not sure why. I
do have a few miscellaneous thoughts to share on the scenario though.
One problem the French would have faced if they
had decided to fight on in North Africa is that French-made weapons
systems such as tanks and aircraft would have only been useful as long
as the spare parts held out. With no new supplies of parts and
replacements from France, the French would be faced with cannibalizing
an ever decreasing supply of French-built equipment to keep a few tanks
and planes functioning even if the Germans or Italians didn’t launch a
major attack. Ammunition for French-built artillery and
small-arms would become a problem if there was a major attack, or
eventually even if there wasn’t. The French would have to use
some ammunition for training if that training was going to be effective.
In order to remain militarily viable in North Africa, France would have
to get weapons from some other industrial country. Britain
wouldn’t be an option in summer 1940 because it didn’t have enough of
anything weapons-wise to equip its own forces, much less the
French. The US was an option for some weapons. The French
had considerable numbers of both fighters and bombers on order from the
US, and the US was releasing some warplanes directly from the US
airforce to France. Most of those planes probably wouldn’t have
arrived until some time in 1941, but US was still delivering the last
few of an order of several hundred Curtis Hawk fighters, along with
some bombers and trainers. Any survivors of the US planes that
were actually in French service would also be helpful because the US
could give an ongoing supply of spare parts. The US could also
supply considerable amounts of World War I surplus small arms and some
artillery—historically the US intended to supply the Brits and French
with over 500,000 small arms, primarily Lee-Enfield rifles. Most
of those went to Britain historically, but if the French had still been
fighting in North Africa chances are that many of those weapons would
have ended up re-equipping evacuated French divisions.
One thing the US couldn’t supply many of in mid-1940 was tanks.
The US had very close to no modern tanks in June 1940. They had
produced about 15 M2 medium tanks (a distant ancestor of the Sherman
with a 37mm main gun and lots of machine guns pointing in various
directions) in late 1939. They also had a few dozen machine-gun
armed early model M2 light tanks. There were several hundred
World War I era tanks (an improved US version of the Renault FT) in
storage. Historically a couple hundred of those ended up in
Canada where they were used for training. In this scenario I
suppose that some of them could have ended up in North Africa.
The US army had just started to get a few light M2A4 tanks out of an
initial order of 329 (increased to 365) off of assembly lines in April
1940. Historically production of the 365 M2A4 wasn’t completed
until March 1941. It might have been possible to increase M2A4
production somewhat, but anything ordered in June 1940 probably
wouldn’t have made it off the assembly lines until November or December
1940 at the earliest. The French might have ended up getting a
few M2A1s mediums (slightly improved M2) starting in November
1940. The US produced 94 of them in late 1940 through August 1941
(out of an order for 126—the rest were apparently cancelled because
considerably better tanks were in the pipeline).
Of course the real question in all of this is when the Germans would
actually go after French holdouts in North Africa. The Germans
would have had a problem in that the kind of resources they would be
short of for North Africa (planes and shipping) were the same things
they needed to have any chance of making Sea Lion work or even of
convincing the British that they had such a chance. Weather would
have made a channel crossing almost impossible by sometime in October,
so the Germans really just had between June and October to do whatever
they were going to do against the British. If they went after
French North Africa first they would make an already tight schedule
very close to impossible. My guess is that crunch time in North
Africa would come after Sea Lion became impossible. Both British
and German power would shift south in October/November 1940.
Comments are very welcome.
Click to e-mail me.
Click here if you want
me
to
let you know when a new issue comes out.
Copyright 2004 By Dale R.
Cozort
Return to Table of Contents
|